
Pet friendly Hotels in Pacos De Ferreira, Porto District
- Change your mindBook hotels with free cancellation
- Be pickySearch almost a million properties worldwide
Check availability on Pacos De Ferreira Pet friendly Hotels
Tonight
Oct 2 - Oct 3Tomorrow
Oct 3 - Oct 4This weekend
Oct 2 - Oct 4Next weekend
Oct 9 - Oct 11Our top choices for Pacos De Ferreira pet-friendly hotels
P4,464
P5,791 total
includes taxes & fees
Oct 6 - Oct 7




2. villa maria caetana
villa maria caetanaFrazão
P5,096
P5,402 total
includes taxes & fees
Oct 5 - Oct 6




3. Glicinia Boutique Hotel
Glicinia Boutique HotelPacos De Ferreira
P8,694
P9,216 total
includes taxes & fees
Oct 5 - Oct 6
P8,740
P9,265 total
includes taxes & fees
Nov 1 - Nov 2
P3,957
P4,195 total
includes taxes & fees
Oct 18 - Oct 19
P7,918
P8,393 total
includes taxes & fees
Nov 2 - Nov 3
P7,970
P8,803 total
includes taxes & fees
Nov 1 - Nov 2
P3,679
P3,899 total
includes taxes & fees
Nov 1 - Nov 2
View all properties
Top Pacos De Ferreira Hotel Reviews
Crowne Plaza Porto by IHG
8/10 Good
"This was a last minute stay for us as our plans changed due to a forest fire in the Douro valley. The hotel room was very clean but unfortunately the shower didn’t work when we arrived, the fault was quickly fixed when we reported it to reception although I had to go downstairs for this as the room phone didn’t work. Breakfast was ok, it was unlabelled which made it much more difficult for me to find items to suit my dairy intolerance and I wasn’t confident in the quality of staff advice when I asked for help. I found enough food but it meant my choices were very limited. Clear allergy labelling and/ or an allergy folder or information sheet on allergens in standard items for customers would really help with this. Staff were very helpful in taking care of our bags and we enjoyed exploring the local area, especially the botanical gardens. We also went to the Casa da Musica for a performance by the Symphonic Orchestra and this was totally amazing, I highly recommend. All in all, this hotel was good value but could be better with slightly more attention to details and allergy information."































